Cases 1 - 10 of 217
Burton v. Illinois Dept of Corrections Parole Board
as 2:2024cv02259
Petitioner:
Stephon Depaul Burton
Respondent:
Illinois Dept of Corrections Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Boyce v. St. Vincent DePaul (Lane Co) et al
as 3:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Sonja Marie Boyce
Defendant:
St. Vincent DePaul (Lane Co) and GBM Gardner Beckley Meadows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DePaul et al v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
as 3:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
BETHANY DePAUL, ARLENE QUARANTA and MEREDITH QUARANTA
Defendant:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Gautreaux v. Warden, SPC Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Jase Depaul Gautreaux
Respondent:
Warden, SPC Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TLUSTY v. SWAIN et al
as 5:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TLUSTY and ROBERT J TLUSTY
Defendant:
D SWAIN, K DAVIS, J ELLENBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEPAUL v. AMAZON.COM, INC.
as 2:2023cv22764
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DEPAUL
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., ABC CORPORATION 1-10 and JOHN DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Parekh v. DePaul University
as 1:2023cv16294
Plaintiff:
Dr. Bharat Parekh
Defendant:
DePaul University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tri-State Organization Inc. et al v. Konza LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
Tri State Organization Inc., Joseph Lentine and Tri-State Organization Inc.
Defendant:
Konza LLC, Richard Boydston, City Of Cincinnati and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
