Cases 51 - 60 of 82
Jones v Nestle USA
as 3:2014cv00940
Plaintiff:
Carl Jones and Deborah Jones
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PROCTOR v. HUGGINS et al
as 1:2014cv00238
Plaintiff:
SPENCER ALLAN PROCTOR
Defendant:
J. C. HUGGINS, KATY POOLE, ROBERT TRASK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv05176
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jones
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01567
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv21395
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jones
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-21395
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jones
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Mumaw et al v. Ohio State Racing Commission et al
as 1:2013cv01048
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Mumaw , Joshua Mumaw and Eyes Of A Child Stables
Defendant:
Ohio State Racing Commission, William Crawford, Richard Kinsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2013cv11740
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jones
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Arthur Ellerd v. County of Los Angeles
as 2:2008cv04289
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ellerd, Jose J Troconis, Craig Y Abe and others
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Steven M Schneider
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jones et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02977
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jones , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
