Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Anderson v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023cv00490
Petitioner:
Dewayne Anderson
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. Riley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Anderson
Defendant:
Fernetta Riley, Lt. Gartland, Charles Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Mobile County District and Circuit Court et al
as 1:2021cv00253
Defendant:
Southern District Court of Alabama, Mobile County District and Circuit Court, Mobile County District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Mobile County District and Circuit Court et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00259
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Anderson
Defendant:
Mobile County Circuit Court, Southern District Court of Alabama, Mobile County District and Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Easter et al
as 5:2019cv03257
Defendant:
Rebecca (lnu), (fnu) Hays, John Doe B and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Lakeshia
as 4:2019cv00658
Defendant:
Swanigan Lakeshia
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dewayne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00412
Defendant:
Walter Myers, Board of Pardons and Paroles, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lorick et al v. A'Viands LLC
as 2:2017cv02585
Plaintiff:
Brian Lorick , Carlus Anderson , Heirbrane Foster and others
Defendant:
A'Viands LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. United States of America
as 4:2015cv01985
Petitioner:
Roderick Dewayne Anderson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Anderson v. Thomas
as 1:2014cv00046
Petitioner:
Michael Dewayne Anderson
Respondent:
Willie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
