Cases 41 - 50 of 3,856
(PC) Mack v. Director of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Director of Corrections, S. M. Rios, Xavier Bercerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. CDCR et al
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Mark Stanley
Defendant:
CDCR, San Quentin State Prison, R. Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gomez v. Milwaukee Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01740
Plaintiff:
Robert L Gomez, Jr
Defendant:
Milwaukee Jail and Tammy Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Milwaukee Jail et al
as 2:2023cv01740
Plaintiff:
Robert L Gomez, Jr
Defendant:
Milwaukee Jail and Tammy Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Diaz v. State of California
as 1:2023cv01783
Petitioner:
Antonio Diaz
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIAZ v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
ROLANDO DIAZ
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL, ENGLISH, WADHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marco Sanchez-Diaz v. Southeast Correctional Center
as 23-3743
Plaintiff:
Marco A. Sanchez-Diaz
Defendant:
Southeast Correctional Center, Department of Corrections
(PC) Romero Diaz v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2023cv01758
Plaintiff:
Oscar Romero Diaz
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Pleasant Valley State Prison, PVSP Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Watson v. Diaz et al
as 1:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
William Xavier Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Diaz, Sanchez and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01926
Petitioner:
Hector Diaz Perez
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
