Cases 1 - 10 of 2,886
Titus v. Omega Center
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis Dickerson v. Milwaukee County, et al
as 24-1622
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DICKERSON
Defendant:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY, C.O. JONES and JOHN DOE, or JANE DOE, Kitchen Supervisor
Travis Dickerson v. Milwaukee County, et al
as 24-1621
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DICKERSON
Defendant:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY, C.O. JONES and JOHN DOE, or JANE DOE, Kitchen Supervisor
Dickerson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01579
Plaintiff:
Jaime Lynn Dickerson
Defendant:
United States of America and Raquel Lilian Evans
Dickerson v. Stobie
as 4:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Michelle Marryann Dickerson
Defendant:
Laura Hawk Stobie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DICKERSON v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv04875
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
RATDOW DICKERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
HARDEN et al v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HARDEN, MARVIN STRONG, TONNY COCKRAIL and others
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BILL JOY, TGGS CANTINE SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yasinov v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Igor Yasinov
Defendant:
United States, Officer Bryant, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Dickerson et al
as 5:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Carmen Mills
Defendant:
Blair Dickerson and Carroll Fulmer Logistics Corporation, a Nevada Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
