Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Earquhart v. United States Marshalls for the Eastern District North Carolina et al
as 1:2020cv00620
Respondent:
United States Marshalls for the Eastern District North Carolina and Piedmont Regional Jail
Petitioner:
Xavier Milton Earquhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cobble v. All Georgia Supreme Judges et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00666
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble and Daniel Castleberry
Defendant:
US District North Georgia, US Magistrate North Georgia, US Magistrate Chattanooga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn v. Cuomo, et al
as 9:2018cv00356
Defendant:
Federal District Attorney Office, D. Trump, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Chief Counsel Pacific District North et al
as 2:2017cv01405
Plaintiff:
Benny Ray Harris, Sr
Defendant:
Chief Counsel Pacific District North and Chief Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kraft v. Office of Chief Counsel North Atlantic District-North
as 1:2016cv01186
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Douglas Kraft
Defendant:
Office of Chief Counsel North Atlantic District-North
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1543
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Percy Clay v. P. Sharp
as 12-2215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY LEE CLAY and DIANE CLAY
Defendant - Appellee:
P. TREVOR SHARP, Individually, and in his capacity as Magistrate, U.S. District Court Middle District, North Carolina
Walter Sadler v. US
as 08-1731
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER LEE SADLER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Western District of North Carolina, GRETCHEN C. F. SHAPPERT, U.S. Attorney, Western District North Carolina and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
