Cases 1 - 10 of 1,138
Doe #1 (JRC) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (JRC), John Doe #2 (TJC), John Doe #3 (RKF) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1101
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
MICHELLE BIELA, SANTORO, HENRY MUSHI and others
BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, PA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Carbondale Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Carbondale Memorial Hospital, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bender v. Savant et al
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bender
Defendant:
FNP Theresa Savant, M.D. Richard Griffin, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gibson v. Idleberg et al
as 6:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Courtney Gibson
Defendant:
Idleberg, Chief Executive Officer, John Doe # 4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Chronister et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Cathy King
Defendant:
N. Chronister, Berkeley County Sheriff's Department, Berkeley County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibbs v. Utilization Review Committee
as 24-891
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIBBS
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FEDUS, Dr., PILLAI, Dr. and others
Miles v. Does 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Does 1, John Does 2, John Does 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
