Cases 1 - 10 of 23
ALEXANDER v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv12108
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE ALEXANDER
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILLIAMS v. GUILFORD COUNTY JAIL (GREENSBORO) et al
as 1:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE ALEXANDER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY JAIL (GREENSBORO), DETENTION OFFICER L. DUFF, RAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. DUFF et al
as 1:2022cv01093
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE ALEXANDER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DETENTION OFFICER DUFF, RAY and DR. W. HAQ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. PVH Corp.
as 22-2738
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cameron Warren
Defendant:
PVH Corp., Stephan Larsson, Ben Preuss and others
Alexander et al v. City of Dallas Texas et al
as 3:2022cv01193
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE ALEXANDER, CARVELL BOWENS, CYRUS CEZAR and others
Defendant:
City of Dallas Texas, Ulysha Renee Hall, EDGARDO GARCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warren v. PVH Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv00851
Plaintiff:
Cameron Warren
Defendant:
PVH Corp., Stephan Larsson, Ben Preuss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Warren v. Guerrero et al
as 1:2021cv11236
Plaintiff:
Cameron Warren
Defendant:
Quendry Guerrero, Kirssis Pimentel-Guerrero, Dominique Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dominique Hackley v. Harold Clarke
as 20-6324
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOMINIQUE ALEXANDER HACKLEY
Jones v. Warden, USP-Leavenworth
as 19-3264
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOMINIQUE ALEXANDER JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, USP-LEAVENWORTH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
