Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Vaughn v. Pounds
as 3:2023cv00580
Petitioner:
Donald Jay Vaughn
Respondent:
Zachary Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn v. North Branch Correctional Institute et al
as 1:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Donald D Vaughn and Donald D. Vaughan
Defendant:
North Branch Correctional Institute, Warden, Commissioner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. VAUGHN
as 1:2021cv00919
Plaintiff:
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR.
Defendant:
DONALD R. VAUGHN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
as 1:2020cv01017
Plaintiff:
Donald D Vaughn
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Donald Vaughn v. FAA, et al
as 16-1377
Petitioner:
Donald A. Vaughn
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration and Michael P. Huerta, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv05762
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, JEFFREY A. BEARD, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2014cv01374
Petitioner:
Christopher Baker
Respondent:
John Wetzel , Donald T. Vaughn and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TWIGGS v. VAUGHN et al
as 2:2014cv00155
Petitioner:
MICHAEL TWIGGS
Respondent:
DONALD T. VAUGHN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERS v. VAUGHN et al
as 2:2013cv07669
Petitioner:
DANIEL PETERS
Respondent:
DONALD T. VAUGHN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn v. Fayram
as 1:2013cv00146
Petitioner:
Donald A Vaughn
Respondent:
John Fayram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
