Cases 1 - 10 of 46
J. v. United States of America et al
as 4:2026cv03845
Plaintiff:
L. J.
Defendant:
United States of America, United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons, FPC Bryan Warden Tanisha Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv02481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pretrial Service:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
ADAMS et al v. TOWN OF BROWNSBURG, INDIANA
as 1:2025cv00867
Plaintiff:
RYAN ADAMS, JACOB ALVAREZ, AARON ATHERTON and others
Defendant:
TOWN OF BROWNSBURG, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Langley et al v. NetJets Aviation Inc
as 2:2025oe00210
Plaintiff:
Gregory Langley, Jim Mohr, Hiram Scott and others
Defendant:
NetJets Aviation Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Langley et al v. NetJets Aviation Inc
as 2:2025cv00209
Plaintiff:
Gregory Langley, Jim Mohr, Hiram Scott and others
Defendant:
NetJets Aviation Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jacobs v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv04983
Plaintiff:
Lynnette Jacobs
Defendant:
Donald Ross and Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. USA
as 3:2024cv00140
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Donald Ross Poole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Cox v. Ross
as 2:2024cv11506
Plaintiff:
Marquan Cox
Defendant:
Donald Ross
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Perry v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2024cv50161
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Warden Gonzales, Andre Matevousian, Timothy Moisant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Andersen v. Michael Cheokas
as 23-13613
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD ROSS ANDERSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CHEOKAS
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
