Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pet-Ag, Inc. v. ICROKUS Inc et al
as 1:2023cv02297
Defendant:
Andrii Dorosh, ICROKUS Inc a New York corporation doing business as Biz Pet doing business as Promaster Pet Store, Andrew Dorosh and others
Plaintiff:
Pet-Ag, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
SENECHKO et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
IVANNA SENECHKO, TETIANA MARTIUSHENKO, SERHII DOROSH and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Dorosh v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2022cv01906
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dorosh
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services and Anoka County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2021cv01260
Plaintiff:
David Yariel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez, Whitted, Dousis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorosh v. Long Island Railroad Company
as 1:2019cv10484
Defendant:
Long Island Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Alexander Dorosh
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Wheelings et al v. Iacuone et al
as 3:2014cv00526
Plaintiff:
Ferdanand Wheelings and Glenda Wheelings
Defendant:
Joseph Iacuone , John Dorosh and Brian Grogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felisa Guzman et al v. Pomona Valley Medical Plaza et al
as 2:2012cv10244
Defendant:
Rubina A Aqueel, Purmina S Chaurushiya, David Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Felisa Guzman and J. R.
Brown et al v. L-3 Communications Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
Rusty Brown , Benny Garcia , Rudy Smith and others
Defendant:
L-3 Communications Corporation and L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
