Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,942
Dotson et al v. CG Roxanne, LLC
as 2:2024cv02521
Plaintiff: Michael Dotson, Todd M. Friedman and Adrian R. Bacon
Defendant: CG Roxanne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Swilling v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00192
Petitioner: Sheldon Swilling
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00188
Petitioner: Kenyatta H. Adams
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00189
Petitioner: Derek L. White
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leo Farnsworth v. Glenn Youngkin
as 24-6273
Plaintiff: LEO BRANDON FARNSWORTH
Defendant: GLENN YOUNGKIN, TERRANCE C. COLE, CHADWICK DOTSON and others
Christopher Lumpkin v. VDOC Director Dotson
as 24-6275
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER DEWAYNE LUMPKIN
Defendant: VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR CHADWICK DOTSON, SUSSEX I STATE PRISON MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, MS. CARTER, Head of All Medical Departments of Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Michael Dotson v. Danone Waters of America, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv02445
Plaintiff: Michael Dotson
Defendant: Danone Waters of America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Dotson v. Town of Lake View
as 4:2024cv01358
Plaintiff: Jennifer Dotson
Defendant: Town of Lake View
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Jeannite v. Melendez et al
as 1:2024cv10698
Plaintiff: Joel Jeannite
Defendant: Christopher Melendez, Brian Gravel, Anthony Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Michael Fuller v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6254
Petitioner: MICHAEL ROY FULLER
Respondent: CHADWICK DOTSON, Director

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?