Cases 51 - 60 of 30,677
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, et al
as 24-6089
Plaintiff:
DONNA R. BRANDT
Defendant:
CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND STAFF, TERRACE DICKERSON, Former Warden, FNU GRANTE, Assistance Warden and others
Baldeo v. Airbnb, Inc.
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
Dr. PHILIP BALDEO and 156 W. 15TH STREET CHELSEA LLC
Defendant:
AIRBNB, INC., JOHN DOES, 1-10 and JANE DOES, 1-10
David McLester v. Lindsey DeGuehery
as 24-6446
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARTIN MCLESTER
Defendant:
DR. LINDSEY DEGUEHERY and NURSE R. JONES
Fredrick Hines v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1970
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Piens v. Reckard et al
as 4:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Thola Dean Piens
Defendant:
Dr. Justin Reckard, Dr. Syed F. Azam, Dr. Scott A. Gering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Susy Short Bear-Traversie v. United States Government, et al
as 24-1960
Plaintiff:
Susy Short Bear-Traversie
Defendant:
United States Government, Fort Meade, SD, Hot Springs, SD, Dr. Smith, Mental Health, PA Cindy Erwin, PA - Primary Doctor and others
Forester-Hoare v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Sean Forester-Hoare
Defendant:
Dr Freeman, Dr Lavoie, Baier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aurel v. Jessup Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Jessup Correctional Institution, Dr. Khalid El-Bedavei, MD, Dr. Muleta Obsu, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Duchnowski et al v. LaRusso et al
as 2:2024cv03433
Plaintiff:
Leo Duchnowski
Defendant:
Anthony LaRusso, Dr. Donna Henig, James Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
