Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Vincent Wilson v. Richard Ashby
as 24-6221
Plaintiff:
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON
Defendant:
DR. RICHARD B. ASHBY, DR. ASIA SWAIN and DR. YASAS RODRIGO
Wilson v. Ashby et al
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Wilson
Defendant:
Dr. Richard Ashby, Dr. Asia Swain and Dr. Vasas Rodrigo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valle v. Obler et al
as 3:2023cv02128
Plaintiff:
Oscar Esteban Valle
Defendant:
Dr. Richard M. Obler, Shanaha, Colleen Stanich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fambra v. Doe et al
as 4:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Fambra
Defendant:
John Doe and Dr. Richard Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dragisich v. West Allis Memorial Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv01229
Plaintiff:
Dusan Dragisich
Defendant:
West Allis Memorial Hospital, West Allis Police Department, Dr Richard S Kowalczyk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodgers v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv02866
Plaintiff:
Tracy Rodgers
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Jane/John Doe, Ms. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilbert v. Abbott et al
as 6:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Wilbert
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, STATE OF TEXAS, Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv01275
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Plummer v. Wellpath, et al
as 23-1637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM PLUMMER
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DR. ROBERT MAXA and others
MOODY v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MOODY
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
