Cases 51 - 60 of 1,032
Morris & Dickson v. DEA
as 23-60284
Petitioner:
Morris & Dickson Company, L.L.C.
Respondent:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Postmeds, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 1:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Postmeds, Inc.
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1528
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nathaniel Callaway v. DEA
as 23-1128
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Callaway
Respondent:
Drug Enforcement Administration
KITLINSKI v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2023cv00963
Plaintiff:
DAREK J. KITLINSKI
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
The Church of the Celestial Heart et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
The Church of the Celestial Heart, Kai Karrel, Jade J. Osborne and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Anne Milgram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tysheed Davis v. United States Marines, et al
as 23-1606
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYSHEED DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARINES, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
HERNANDEZ v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
JORGE E. HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Alexandr Klimashevsky v. DEA
as 23-1543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDR KLIMASHEVSKY
Defendant / Appellee:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Petersen v. USA et. al.
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Ariel Petersen
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
