Cases 1 - 10 of 172
Vose v. Kilmartin, et al
as 24-1066
Plaintiff:
CARLTON VOSE
Defendant:
PETER F. KILMARTIN, GERALD J. COYNE, PATRICIA K. ROCHA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Al Tudor Dupont et al v. Sterling Family Trust et al
as 2:2023cv09785
Petitioner:
Al Tudor Dupont and Aurelia Anderson
Defendant:
c/o Sterling Family Trust, Beverly Hills Properties, LLC and Sterling Family Trust
Interested Party:
Hana Kommel Williams, Brandon Lawrence and Lauren Langer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Webb v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2023cv06034
Plaintiff:
David Q Webb
Defendant:
State of Washington, Kitsap County, Chad M Enright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Metcalf v. DuPont et al
as 3:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Melonie Metcalf
Defendant:
DuPont and Ampthill Rayon Workers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Chapman v. Karp
as 23-923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pamela Chapman
Defendant / Appellee:
Jonathon Karp, Nancy Graham, Hope van Beuren and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Sexual Harassment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
