Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Thomas v. Hunter
as 2:2026cv11467
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dwayne Thomas
Defendant:
Bruce Hunter
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Oetjen v. Cleveland Home Title, Ltd. et al
as 2:2026cv00041
Plaintiff:
Eric Oetjen
Defendant:
Cleveland Home Title, Ltd. doing business as Performance Title, Brincs Warehousing Storage, Inc. and Dwayne Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Beasley v. Greenlee
as 25-10411
Plaintiff:
Peter Beasley
Defendant:
Gregory Greenlee, Dennis Schultz, Blacks in Technology, L.L.C. and others
LATTIMORE v. WILKERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00253
Defendant:
MARY ANN JOHNSON, CARRETTA WILKERSON, GENEVA GRIMMAGE-THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER DAMON LATTIMORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Thomas v. D G Louisiana L L C
as 2:2024cv00791
Defendant:
D G Louisiana L L C
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dwayne Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Horton #092674 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01300
Petitioner:
Dwayne Thomas Horton
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horton #092674 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Dwayne Thomas Horton
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv02575
Petitioner:
Dwayne Thomas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thomas v. United States of America
as 22-6452
Petitioner:
DWAYNE THOMAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas v. White et al
as 4:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Thomas
Defendant:
Louis White and David Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
