Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hanson v. Payne et al
as 3:2026cv00166
Plaintiff:
Darrell Hanson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, James Dycus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Poindexter v. Mothershed et al
as 2:2026cv00056
Plaintiff:
Eddie A Poindexter
Defendant:
Mothershed, B Carroll, Michelle Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reginald Dunahue v. Myron Rhodes, et al
as 26-1489
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Dunahue
Defendant:
Myron Rhodes, EARU, ADC, Ladarius Williams, EARU, ADC, James Dycus, Warden, EARU, ADC and others
Milburn v. Dycus et al
as 4:2026cv00172
Plaintiff:
Randy J Milburn
Defendant:
Dycus, A J Johnson, J Deen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donnally et al v. The 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 2:2025cv12128
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Donnally, Neil Dorfman, Pattie Douglas Howell and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Poindexter v. Odom et al
as 4:2025cv00875
Plaintiff:
Eddie A Poindexter
Defendant:
Natasha Odom and J Dycus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
DYCUS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as PAE/2:24-cv-04398
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA DYCUS
DYCUS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04398
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA DYCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yancey v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00514
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, D Earl, James Dycus and others
Plaintiff:
John B Yancey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
