Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Luiz E Lima De Moraes v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv06764
Plaintiff:
Luiz E Lima De Moraes
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Lima v. City of East Providence, et al
as 20-1688
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NADINE E. LIMA
Defendant / Appellee:
EAST PROVIDENCE, RI, by and through its Finance Director, Malcolm Moore, KATHRYN CROWLEY, individually and in her official capacity as Superintendent of the City of East Providence School Department and EAST PROVIDENCE SCHOOL DEPARTMENT, by and through its Superintendent, individually and in her official capacity, Kathryn Crowley
(PC) Roberts v. Deleon et al
as 1:2018cv01551
Defendant:
S. Sanchez, I. Vera, E. Souvannakham and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Tyrone Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lima v. East Providence et al
as 1:2017cv00156
Plaintiff:
Nadine E. Lima
Defendant:
City of East Providence and Kathryn Crowley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lima v. City of East Providence et al
as 1:2014cv00513
Plaintiff:
Nadine E. Lima
Defendant:
City of East Providence , East Providence School Department and Kim Mercer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
J&J Sports Productions Inc v. Roxana's Investment LLC et al
as 6:2013mc00142
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Roxana's Investment LLC and Roxana E Lima
J&J Sports Productions Inc v. Roxana's Investment LLC et al
as 6:2011cv02433
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Roxana's Investment LLC and Roxana E Lima
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Byron Lima-Lima v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-73001
Petitioner:
BYRON ESTUARDO LIMA-LIMA, AKA Byron Lima, AKA Byron E. Lima
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Penigar v. Nass et al
as 8:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
Marion R. Penigar
Defendant:
M. Nass and E Lima
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
