Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Brown, Jr v. Carey
as 2:2023cv04145
Petitioner:
Ronald E Brown Jr
Respondent:
Dwayne Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clinton C. Barlow, III v. Freda L. Wolfson, et al
as 23-1187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDA L. WOLFSON, ROGER TANEY, GARRET E. BROWN, JR. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barlow v. United States of America
as 22-1857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clinton C. Barlow, III
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Theodore A. McKee, Jerome B. Simandle and others
Clinton Barlow, III v. Freda Wolfson, et al
as 22-2441
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDA WOLFSON, ROGER TANEY, GARRET E. BROWN, JR. and others
FARMERS NEW CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE ESTATE OF PHILLIP E. BROWN, JR. et al
as 1:2022cv01534
Plaintiff:
FARMERS NEW CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
THE ESTATE OF PHILLIP E. BROWN, JR., MIDEAST DELIVERY SOLUTIONS LLC, RONALD HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
George Brown, Jr. v. United States
as 22-2087
Petitioner / Appellant:
George E. Brown, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Barlow III v. Wolfson et al
as 1:2022cv01152
Plaintiff:
Clinton C Barlow III
Defendant:
Freda Wolfson, Roger Taney, Garret E Brown Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BROWN v. USA
as 1:2022cv00313
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE E. BROWN, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
