Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Bell v. Bayside Ambulatory Surgery Center et al
as 1:2023cv24570
Plaintiff:
Falisha Bell
Defendant:
Bayside Surgery Center, DR. Luis E. Mendex, MD, Bayside Ambulatory Surgery Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03597
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY E MENDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MENDEZ v. AVILES et al
as 2:2023cv02839
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS E MENDEZ
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and FRANCIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
London v. Brush-Strode et al
as 3:2021cv00197
Plaintiff:
Barry D London
Defendant:
Brush-Strode, Shana D Brink, R Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez Palafox v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00582
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Mendez Palafox
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00167
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Darren Shanks v. E. Mendez, et al
as 21-15503
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARREN SHANKS
Defendant / Appellee:
E. MENDEZ, Correctional Officer-Lieutentant and D. LOPEZ, Correctional Officer-Lieutenant
ANDINO v. J.E.M. CAPITEL DESIGN CORP. et al
as 1:2020cv25249
Defendant:
J.E.M. CAPITEL DESIGN CORP., JORGE E. MENDEZ, JEM DRYWALL and others
Plaintiff:
ELVIN R. ANDINO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
(PC) Shanks v. Mendez et al
as 1:2020cv01083
Defendant:
E. Mendez and D. Lopez
Plaintiff:
Darren Shanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
