Cases 21 - 30 of 495
Smith v. Sumner et al
as 6:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Smith
Defendant:
Stephanie Sumner, Ms. Lawson and Carrie Cunnagin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinson v. Dallas County Jail & Associates et al
as 3:2022cv02317
Plaintiff:
Tahj Pinson
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail & Associates, FNU Miller, FNU Saurez and others
Interested Party:
Marian Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Smith v. Stanley Payne
as 22-3130
Petitioner / Appellant:
David E. Smith
Respondent / Appellee:
Stanley Payne
Smith v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00247
Petitioner:
Leonard E. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cruz Montoya v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv02625
Plaintiff:
James John Cruz Montoya
Defendant:
Justin E. Smith, Joshua Taylor and Deputy Deputy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv05186
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
William E. Smith, Quentin L. Smith and Floy E. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grauberger v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2022cv02166
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Grauberger
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpsted, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Smith
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Avren Scott
Defendant:
E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Troup County Sheriff Department
as 3:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Sandy E. Smith
Defendant:
Troup County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kessman v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01859
Plaintiff:
Bradley C. Kessman
Defendant:
Justin E. Smith, Shaffer, Balkema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
