Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Urrutia v. Barajas et al
as 5:2023cv03055
Plaintiff:
Oscar David Urrutia
Defendant:
(fnu) Barajas, Courtney Prewitt, Michael Reagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. King et al
as 6:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Fred A. Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
E.J. King and Brazoria County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Lilley et al
as 9:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Sabas Martinez
Defendant:
Lynn J. Lilley, Lefield, Captain T. Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran v. Smith
as 1:2022cv01949
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shane Cochran
Defendant:
Sgt. E.J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2019cv03084
Defendant:
P. Sullivan, Lawrence Gumboa and Chief Deputy Warden E.J. Borha
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Gibney et al
as 5:2019ct03151
Defendant:
Garrett Smith, Officer Moreland and E.J. Gibney
Plaintiff:
Eric Ramond Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griggs v. Levett et al
as 1:2018cv03361
Plaintiff:
Miles Griggs
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions Medical Care and Sheriff E.J. Levett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. California Departmentof Corrections and Rehabilitation Representatives et al
as 3:2017cv01866
Plaintiff:
Zevonzell Sims
Defendant:
California Departmentof Corrections and Rehabilitation Representatives, S. Velazco, J. Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. Adam et al
as 4:2017cv03348
Plaintiff:
E.J. McElroy
Defendant:
Adam, PBSP Medical Dept. & Dental Dept. and Olsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Jr. v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2016cv01106
Plaintiff:
Mack Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Mr Furlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
