Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Earle v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2026cv02290
Plaintiff:
Taurean Earle
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Butler v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2026cv08080
Plaintiff:
Raymond Earl Butler, II
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Jamie Dimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Costa Fruit & Produce Company, Inc. v. Bertucci's Restaurants, LLC et al
as 6:2026cv02075
Plaintiff:
Costa Fruit & Produce Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Bertucci's Restaurants, LLC, Earl Enterprises Corporate, LLC, THOMAS AVALLONE and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0499 Agricultural Commodities Act
MOORE v. FLURY et al
as 4:2026cv00451
Plaintiff:
EARL LEE MOORE
Defendant:
RONALD W FLURY and DARLENE ROLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Fox News Network et al
as 2:2026cv00852
Plaintiff:
John Earle Sullivan
Defendant:
Fox News Network LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Fox News Channel, Fox Corporation, Porter Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Ricketts v. Grate et al
as 6:2026cv00588
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ricketts
Defendant:
Sgt. Anthony E. Grate, John R Lopez, Craig B. Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Bingham v. Happen Bank, National Association
as 3:2026cv05278
Plaintiff:
Walter Rex Earl Bingham
Defendant:
Happen Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Mixon v. Cain
as 3:2026cv00746
Plaintiff:
Van Earl Mixon
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gallegos v. Seely et al
as 4:2026cv05151
Plaintiff:
David Earl Ray Gallegos
Defendant:
Karl Seely, Shantell Acosta and Heather Croft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
