Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wilson v. City of St. Louis Public Library et al
as 4:2023cv00936
Plaintiff:
James Earl Wilson
Defendant:
City of St. Louis Public Library and Public Safety Dlr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. The Secretary of the Navy, et al
as 2:2019cv00515
Plaintiff:
Barby Earl Wilson
Defendant:
The Navy Chief of Chaplains, The Chief of Naval Personnel and The Secretary of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ARNOLD, et al v. SECRETARY OF THE NAVY et al
as 1:2019cv02755
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DUFOUR, ANDREW CALHOUN, TIMOTHY DEMY and others
Defendant:
NAVY CHIEF OF CHAPLAINS, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY and CHIEF OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. State of Colorado
as 6:2019cv00799
Plaintiff:
Gary Earl Wilson
Defendant:
State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lancaster et al v. Secretary of the Navy et al
as 2:2019cv00095
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dufour, Andrew Calhoun, Timothy Demy and others
Defendant:
The Secretary of the Navy, The Chief of Naval Personnel and The Navy Chief of Chaplains
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. Arkansas Department of Correction
as 3:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
James Earl Wilson
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Arkansas, State of
as 3:2010cv00261
Plaintiff:
James Earl Wilson
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swann v. City of Richmond
as 07-1981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWAYNE SWANN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF RICHMOND, The, JAMES EARL WILSON, Officer, In his individual capacity, KEVIN PAUL HATHAWAY, Officer, In his individual capacity and others
Wilson v. United States Treasury Department et al
as 4:2007cv00080
Plaintiff:
James Earl Wilson
Defendant:
United States Treasury Department, United States Secret Service and United States Contractors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
