Cases 1 - 10 of 10
USA v. Guzman-Hernandez
as 24-40329
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Juan Edgar Guzman-Hernandez
Mendez v. Perfect Auto Repairs Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05926
Plaintiff:
Edgar Guzman Mendez
Defendant:
Perfect Auto Repairs Inc. and Lubna Saleem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Jordan-Ashley, LLC et al v. Puerto Nuevo Mexican and Seafood Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
JORDAN-ASHLEY, LLC, GREAT TRAIN ROBBERY SOLAR PLANT, LLC, STORAGE DEPOT NC, LLC and others
Defendant:
PUERTO NUEVO MEXICAN AND SEAFOOD RESTAURANT, INC., JAIME LEON, JAVIER LEON OLIVARES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
American Taekwondo Association Inc v. Guzman et al
as 4:2021cv00704
Plaintiff:
American Taekwondo Association Inc
Defendant:
Edgar Guzman and Bad Wolf Martial Arts LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01779
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Tierny, et al., v. Haresh et al
as 2:2018cv02057
Defendant:
David Haresh, Henry Abe and Edgar Guzman
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brown and Richard Tierny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Edgar Guzman-Farias v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-73330
Petitioner:
EDGAR ALBERTO GUZMAN-FARIAS, AKA Edgar Guzman, AKA Edgar A. Guzman, AKA Edgar Alberto Guzman, AKA Edgar Guzmanfarias
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Martin Guzman v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-40989
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARTIN EDGAR GUZMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Guzman v. Thaler
as 5:2011cv00006
Petitioner:
Martin Edgar Guzman
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guzman v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv00143
Petitioner:
Martin Edgar Guzman
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
