Cases 1 - 10 of 45
KAETZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv21368
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JUDGE CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Kaetz v. USA, et al
as 23-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORP and others
KAETZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2023cv02021
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUDGE KEVIN MCNULTY, JUDGE CLAIRE C. CECCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
William Kaetz v. Educational Credit Management, et al
as 20-2592
Defendant / Appellee:
EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORP, EQUIFAX INC, TRANSUNION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00064
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dennis v. U.S. Department of Education et al
as 1:2019cv02064
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Education and ECMC Shared Services Company
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Dennis
Intervenor Defendant:
Educational Credit Management Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In Re: Christopher Ole Munch
as 2:2018cv01203
Appellee:
Education Credit Management Corp. and U.S. Department of Education
Appellant:
Christopher Ole Munch
In Re Debtor:
Christopher Ole Munch
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
