Cases 41 - 50 of 3,234
ALLEN v. KUHN ESQ. et al
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM ALLEN
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGaughy v. Fordice et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Mario Rodricus McGaughy
Defendant:
Kirk Fordice, Attorney General Mike Moore, Board of Supervisors Lee County 1996-1998 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowry v. Ellis et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lowry
Defendant:
Heather Ellis, Arrin Parks, Dana Marks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan v. Unknown District Attorney of Maverick County, TX.
as 2:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Ellis James Bryan
Defendant:
Unknown District Attorney of Maverick County, TX.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
VANDERPOOL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. VANDERPOOL, JR.
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, MARK PAYNE, JAY HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
John Ellis Johnson
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Crenshaw v. Staton Healthcare Service, et al
as 24-10338
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES CRENSHAW
Defendant:
STATON HEALTHCARE SERVICE and ELLIS
Newman et al v. Smith County, Texas et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brian Newman, Latosha Newman, Joyce Newman and others
Defendant:
Smith County, Texas, Sheriff Larry R Smith, John Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ellis v. Sifuentes et al
as 4:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Christian Jamal Ellis
Defendant:
Anthony Sifuentes, Marquis Taylor, L Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Hooper
as 24-30066
Petitioner:
Ellis Reed
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and Louisiana State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
