Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Devoe v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2026cv06393
Plaintiff:
Israel Devoe
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Thomas Patterson, Nathan Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuvell v. Haley, et al
as 26-1961
Plaintiff:
WALTER EUGENE TUVELL, JR., PHD
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HALEY, (Husband/Father), AMANDA HALEY, (Wife/Stepmother), AUTUMN HALEY, ((Step)-Daughter) and others
Epps v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv00090
Plaintiff:
Kimora Mone Epps
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Beatriz Y Bueso Alvarez v. T. Onderdonk et al
as 2:2026cv09533
Plaintiff:
Beatriz Y. Bueso Alvarez
Defendant:
T. Onderdonk, Jackeline Munoz, Officer Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Cox, et al
as 3:2026cv02129
Plaintiff:
Joshua Isaac Martinez
Defendant:
Warden Jared Cox, Major Mark Ficken, Captain Harrel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. COX et al
as 3:2026cv04782
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ISAAC MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JARED COX, MARK FICKEN, HARREL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Federal Trade Commission v. Harris, et al.
as 26-4729
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
SUCCESS BY MEDIA, LLC, ENHANCED CAPITAL, CAROL MAGDA and others
:
LINA NOLAND, THOMAS G. SACCA, JAMES D. NOLAND, JR. and others
(SS) Epps v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv05741
Plaintiff:
Keystone Da Money E Sex Epps
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Buckner v. Greenville County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2026cv02951
Plaintiff:
Anthony Buckner
Defendant:
Deputy Steven A. Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
