Cases 1 - 10 of 15
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. ERH SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01691
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION FUND, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant:
ERH SERVICES, LLC and EVAN HORNER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LIPTOK v. FAZIO et al
as 2:2023cv02955
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LIPTOK
Defendant:
ROBERT BRUCE FAZIO and ERH CAPITAL PARTNERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S2 Yachts, Inc. v. ERH Marine Corp.
as 21-1836
Plaintiff / Appellee:
S2 YACHTS, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
ERH MARINE CORP.
S2 Yachts, Inc. v. ERH Marine Corp.
as 21-1810
Plaintiff / Appellee:
S2 YACHTS, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
ERH MARINE CORP.
S2 Yachts, Inc. v. ERH Marine Corp.
as 20-1479
Defendant / Appellant:
ERH MARINE CORP.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
S2 YACHTS, INC.
ERH Enterprises Inc v. KIK Custom Products Inc
as 2:2019cv02328
Defendant:
KIK Custom Products Inc
Plaintiff:
ERH Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tann v. Emanuel County Hospital Authority et al
as 6:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Timothy Tann
Defendant:
Emanuel County Hospital Authority , ERHospitals, LLC , ERH Shared Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
S2 Yachts, Inc. v. ERH Marine Corp.
as 1:2018cv00389
Plaintiff:
S2 Yachts, Inc.
Defendant:
ERH Marine Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
LM Insurance Corporation v. ERH et al
as 3:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
LM Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
ERH , Aaron Handschumacher , Billie Anne Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castro v. Hernandez et al
as 8:2016cv00513
Plaintiff:
Rafael Gonzalez Castro
Defendant:
Edgar Hernandez and ERH Concrete LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
