Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Crutchfield v. Weakley County, TN et al
as 1:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Dalton Eric Daniel Crutchfield, Jr.
Defendant:
Weakley County, TN, Robby Hatler and FNU Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crutchfield v. Jaccson et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Dalton Eric Daniel Crutchfield, Jr.
Defendant:
Carl Jaccson and Kent Treece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crutchfield v. Weakley County
as 1:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Dalton Eric Daniel Crutchfield, Jr.
Defendant:
Weakley County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Straka et al
as 7:2022cv01387
Petitioner:
Eric Daniel Jennings
Respondent:
K Straka and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Leah
as 2:2022cv01014
Plaintiff:
Eric D Sims and Eric Daniel Sims, Jr
Defendant:
Leah and Dubuque County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sawyer v. Boone County, KY et al
as 2:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anthony Sawyer
Defendant:
Boone County, KY, Sheriff Michael Helmig, City of Florence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00135
Defendant:
Emma Nurse, Hawkins County Jail Medical Department, Melissa Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Daniel Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00127
Defendant:
Cpl. Wialliam Mosley, Sgt. Smith, Nurse Carmen and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Daniel Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glass v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv00174
Defendant:
Jessie Spurgin, Paul Penzone, D Grey and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Daniel Glass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pealer v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00944
Plaintiff:
Eric Daniel Pealer
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
