Cases 81 - 90 of 191
Florence-Elizabeth Mason, et al v. Philadelphia Police Department, et al
as 14-4108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLORENCE-ELIZABETH MASON, Individually and on behalf of her minor children, T.M. C.M. & S.M., affiant victim(s) and witnesses to criminal activities, VINCENT T. MASON, JR., Individually, affiant victim(s) and witnesses to criminal activities and CRYSTAL MASON, Individually, affiant victim(s) and witnesses to criminal activities
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, and its officers, KENNETH JEREMIAH, The Philadelphia Housing Authorities President & Chief Executive Officer, PATRICK AGNEW, The Office of PHA audit and compliance, investigating officer and others
Defendant:
MISTON, EDT. the 14th District Police Precint and its officer(s), in their official and private capacity, DIGUISSEE, CAPT., LARKS, LT. and others
Local 541 Transport Workers Union of America AFL-CIO et al v. Fudge et al
as 3:2014cv03639
Plaintiff:
Local 541 Transport Workers Union of America AFL-CIO and Transport Workers Union of America AFL-CIO
Defendant:
James Fudge, Earl Smith, Rick Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Florence-Elizabeth Mason, et al v. Philadelphia Police Department, et al
as 14-4069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLORENCE-ELIZABETH MASON, Individually and on behalf of her minor children, T.M. C.M. & S.M., affiant victim(s) and witnesses to criminal activities, VINCENT T. MASON, JR., Individually, affiant victim(s) and witnesses to criminal activities and CRYSTAL MASON, Individually, affiant victim(s) and witnesses to criminal activities
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, and its officers, KENNETH JEREMIAH, The Philadelphia Housing Authorities President & Chief Executive Officer, PATRICK AGNEW, The Office of PHA audit and compliance, investigating officer and others
Defendant:
MISTON, EDT. the 14th District Police Precint and its officer(s), in their official and private capacity, DIGUISSEE, CAPT., LARKS, LT. and others
Defendant - Pro Se Appellee:
THIRD CORSA INC., aka First Corsa Inc, dba Elaine Luckin & Lenny Luckin, in their personal & private capacity
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01487
Plaintiff:
Shawn Earl Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Corizon Medical Provider et al
as 4:2014cv01720
Plaintiff:
Anthony Earl Smith
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Provider and Brookwood Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv24954
Plaintiff:
Shawn Earl Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Florence-Elizabeth Mason, et al v. Philadelphia Police Department, et al
as 14-3502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLORENCE-ELIZABETH MASON, Individually and on behalf of her minor children, T.M. C.M. & S.M., affiant victim(s) and witnesses to criminal activities, VINCENT T. MASON, JR., Individually, affiant victim(s) and witnesses to criminal activities and CRYSTAL MASON, Individually, affiant victim(s) and witnesses to criminal activities
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, and its officers, KENNETH JEREMIAH, The Philadelphia Housing Authorities President & Chief Executive Officer, PATRICK AGNEW, The Office of PHA audit and compliance, investigating officer and others
Defendant:
MISTON, EDT. the 14th District Police Precint and its officer(s), in their official and private capacity, DIGUISSEE, CAPT., LARKS, LT. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joseph Earl Smith, Jr. v. People for the State of California
as 2:2014cv04083
Respondent:
People for the State of California
Petitioner:
Joseph Earl Smith, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
