Cases 1 - 10 of 100
EARNEST v. MILLER et al
as 4:2026cv00454
Plaintiff:
JAMES M EARNEST
Defendant:
DAMON MILLER and REY CARLOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Riverside Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2026cv00932
Plaintiff:
Neicole Marie Lewis
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail Authority, Tojuanna Y Mack, Earnest L. Giles, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodley v. Holloway
as 3:2026cv01289
Petitioner:
Earnest Woodley
Respondent:
James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv13003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
United States of America v. Singletary, II (Caldwell)
as 26-2357
Defendant:
DWIGHT A SINGLETARY, II, MCKENZIE MERRIALICE COLES, NEHEMIAH FANE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Clayton v. Hunt et al
as 3:2026cv00059
Plaintiff:
Earnest Barnard Clayton
Defendant:
Adrina Hunt, Amber St Laurent, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Meyers et al
as 4:2026cv05136
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Hamilton
Defendant:
Jennifer Meyers, Ann Adams, Stephanie Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office et al
as 9:2026cv80995
Plaintiff:
Earnest Carter
Defendant:
Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, Major Darlene Morris, Captain A. Nadalna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Earnest Halford v. CCI Prison Staff, et al
as 26-2659
Plaintiff:
EARNEST L. HALFORD
Defendant:
CCI PRISON STAFF, JOHN DOES, Van Drivers 1-2, Department of Health Services Director, WRC EMPLOYEES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
