Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Tegoseak v. Office of Special Prosecutions et al
as 3:2026cv00255
Plaintiff:
Rockwell Tegoseak
Defendant:
Office of Special Prosecutions, Easter and Lindsey Maguigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez (ID 2000082769) v. Torres et al
as 5:2026cv03205
Plaintiff:
Rafael Perez
Defendant:
Steven Torres, Monica Torres, Shannon Marten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Schifano et al v. Gary Merlino Construction Co Inc
as 2:2026cv02233
Plaintiff:
Aryal Schifano, Stoney Kuck and Glenn Easter
Defendant:
Gary Merlino Construction Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Tegoseak v. Dunleavy et al
as 3:2026cv00244
Plaintiff:
Rockwell Tegoseak
Defendant:
Michael Dunleavy, Benjamin Dresner, Nathaniel Hainje and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fusilier v. City of Wichita Police Department, et al
as 26-3097
Plaintiff:
KAREN M. FUSILIER
Defendant:
WICHITA POLICE DEPARTMENT, EDWARD BROWER, CORRIE MCCLUSKEY and others
Easter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2026cv00384
Plaintiff:
Malinda Sue Easter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Taylor, Et al v. Easter, Et al
as 3:2026cv00555
Plaintiff:
Donald Taylor and Deborah Taylor
Defendant:
C.J. Easter, Derek Wise, Kyle Bacon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amadi v. United States of America et al
as 5:2026ct03131
Plaintiff:
Okechukwu Desmond Amadi
Defendant:
United States of America, Warden Katina Heckard, Unit Manager J. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv03233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
