Cases 1 - 10 of 6,455
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Brown v. Collier
as 2:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Sonja Eddings Brown
Defendant:
Parker J. Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffin v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv01443
Petitioner:
Sam Griffin
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tchamanzar v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
as 4:2024cv01403
Plaintiff:
Ed Tchamanzar
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Acosta, Jr. v. Ortiz et al
as 4:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Raul Anthony Acosta, Jr.
Defendant:
Detention Officer Ortiz, Detention Officer Salazar, Sgt. Bigham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mirinaviciene v. Keuka College
as 24-1006
Plaintiff:
STACEY MIRINAVICIENE
Defendant:
KEUKA COLLEGE, AMY STOREY, BRADLEY FUSTER and others
Pena v. Gonzalez
as 24-20163
Plaintiff:
Martin Pena, Jr.
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Sheriff of Harris County and Joshua Dillard, Jailer/ Public Servant
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
