Cases 11 - 20 of 40
PALMER et al v. COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2021mc00113
Plaintiff:
CHRISTY PALMER, VARTAN PIROUMIAN, JEAN-CLAUDE FRANCHITTI and others
Defendant:
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION and COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS U.S. CORPORATION
3Rd Party Defendant:
MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC.
COX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94691
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY EDWARD COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv83604
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DALE EDWARD COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shane Cox v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 20-40183
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHANE EDWARD COX
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
COX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv00244
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Orta, et al (TV2)
as 3:2019cv00165
Plaintiff:
Brent Edward Cox
Defendant:
Tom Spangler, Knoxville Police Department, Geraldo Orta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cox v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2019cv03021
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Cox
Defendant:
BNSF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cox v. Peters et al
as 2:2019cv00376
Defendant:
Appropriate Housing Officer, Appropriate Job Assignment employee, Appropriate Personal BHS Counselor of Inmate Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Edward Cox, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. James Cox
as 19-50106
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD COX, also known as Jamie Cox, also known as Parker James
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cox v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2018cv00252
Petitioner:
Shane Edward Cox
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
