Cases 41 - 50 of 20,723
Beamon #672483 v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Edward Minaskar Beamon #672483
Defendant:
Derek Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbett v. City Of Rockport et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Edward Manual Corbett
Defendant:
City Of Rockport, Aransas County and Mayor Jaroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zinner v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
Edward M. Zinner
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Newsom et al
as 5:2024cv02478
Plaintiff:
Juan T. Tyler
Defendant:
Governor of CA Gavin Newsom, Warden Jeffrey Macomber, Warden Edward Borla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Williams v. Borla
as 2:2024cv01197
Petitioner:
Cameron Williams
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRASHEAR v. WARDEN (N.C.C.F.)
as 1:2024cv00727
Petitioner:
EDWARD BRASHEAR
Respondent:
WARDEN (N.C.C.F.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker #230537 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
James Edward Walker #230537
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Warden, USP Canaan
as 1:2024cv00720
Petitioner:
Reginald Edward Green
Respondent:
Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
