Prisoner Petitions Cases
Edwin Martin v. Gaylon Lay, et al
as 16-4458
Plaintiff - Appellant: Edwin Martin
Defendant - Appellee: Gaylon Lay, Warden, Cummins Unit, originally named as G Lay, Jared Byers, Assistant Warden Security Department, Cummins Unit, originally named as J Buyers, Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Wendy Kelly) and others
Martin v. Steve et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00084
Plaintiff: Edwin Martin
Defendant: Steve, Denise Chance, Royr Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Lay et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00076
Plaintiff: Edwin Martin
Defendant: G Lay , J Buyers , Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Martin v. Jim MacDonald, et al
as 14-55906
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT EDWIN MARTIN
Respondent - Appellee: JIM MACDONALD, KAMALA HARRIS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Robert Edwin Martin v. Corrections Corporation of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv00228
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of California, James Beard, California State Of and others
Petitioner: Robert Edwin Martin
Martin v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2013cv02014
Petitioner: Robert Edwin Martin
Respondent: Corrections Corporation of America, California, State of and Nevada, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Quarterman
as 08-10533
Petitioner - Appellant: CARL EDWIN MARTIN, II
Respondent - Appellee: NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Martin v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv00015
Petitioner: Carl Edwin Martin, II
Defendant: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?