Cases 1 - 10 of 422
Johnson v. Brady, et al
as 24-1106
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
JILL BRADY, JENNA KRUSZKA, CATHERINE SHEA and others
ELDER v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
RICHARD ELDER
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson (PS) v. Brady et al
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Defendant:
Jill Brady, Jenna Kruszka, Catherine Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Elder v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6101
Petitioner:
JOHN CHRISTOPHER ELDER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia D.O.C.
Elder v. Shook et al
as 2:2024cv02013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bennett Elder
Defendant:
Captain Jacob Shook, Sergeant Justice Cato, Sergeant John Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HUGHES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
StClair et al v. SCI-Mercer et al
as 1:2023cv01838
Petitioner:
Kyle Robert StClair and Bethany Elder
Respondent:
Warden SCI-Mercer and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
