Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00692
Defendant:
David R. Jones, Elizabeth Carol Freeman, Jackson Walker, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Bouchard v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Morton S Bouchard
Defendant:
David R Jones, Elizabeth Carol Freeman, Jackson Walker, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Adkins et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2021cv01818
Plaintiff:
Melinda Adkins, Gerald Ed Andrews, Estate of Rich Romer and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Monsanto Company, Solutia, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McClanahan et al v. Natchitoches Nursing & Rehabilitation Center L L C et al
as 1:2021cv00332
Plaintiff:
Peggy Ann McCleland, Marshell Ray Jones, Stacy D. Jones and others
Defendant:
Kacey Masters, Natchitoches Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC, Miranda Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FREEMAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv04476
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH A. FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01826
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rose Freeman
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pierre v. Niklaus et al
as 5:2013cv03803
Plaintiff:
George Pierre
Defendant:
Jenny Niklaus, Teresa Schmitz, EHC Board of Directors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
FREEMAN et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67016
Plaintiff:
JACK L. FREEMAN and ELIZABETH L. FREEMAN
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Eli Lilly et al
as 4:2011cv00256
Plaintiff:
Alberta Rose Jones
Defendant:
Eli Lilly, John Wesley Hall , Jennifer Maher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
