Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jones v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Ellis Jones
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Alexandria (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2020cv01263
Plaintiff:
Kimberlea E Ellis Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JONES JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv14901
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY ELLIS JONES JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLIS JONES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv03000
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Plaintiff:
SHEIRICA ELLIS JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
John Jones, Jr. v. Thomas Mackie
as 16-1985
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ELLIS JONES, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS MACKIE, Warden
John Jones, Jr. v. J. Dral, et al
as 15-1497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ELLIS JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
J. DRAL, Deputy Sheriff and UNKNOWN WEISS, Sgt. Deputy Sheriff
Jones #646343 v. Dral et al
as 1:2015cv00252
Plaintiff:
John Ellis Jones #646343, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Dral and Unknown Weiss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones #646343 v. Mackie
as 2:2014cv00260
Petitioner:
John Ellis Jones #646343, Jr.
Respondent:
Thomas Mackie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2014cv02846
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ellis Jones, III
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Shelby County D.A. Office, M.T.M.H.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
