Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00601
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Dreifuerst v. Obama et al
as 2:2018cv00428
Plaintiff:
Denise A Dreifuerst
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Emily J Moore, Dryden Terrace Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In The Matter of Emily J. Wasserman
as 2:2018mc00031
Plaintiff:
In The Matter of Emily J. Wasserman
Hardaway v. Kerr
as 2:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
David W Hardaway
Defendant:
Emily J Kerr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Sherwood v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv04529
Plaintiff:
Jahmal Isaiah Sherwood
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Brian Kemp, Gwinnett County State Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ida Smith v. All persons claiming a present, et al
as 17-2005
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IDA SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ALL PERSONS CLAIMING A PRESENT OR FUTURE INTEREST, PAUL HOFFMAN, JANE HOFFMAN WALKER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WAYNE CHESTERFIELD
Board of Forensic Document Examiners et al v. American Bar Association et al
as 1:2017cv01130
Plaintiff:
Board of Forensic Document Examiners , M Patricia Fisher , Lynda Hartwick and others
Defendant:
American Bar Association , The Judges' Journal and Thomas Vastrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Navarro v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv00706
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Emily J. Navarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Keeney v. City of Auburn et al
as 5:2017cv00106
Plaintiff:
Emilie J. Keeney
Defendant:
City of Auburn, City of Auburn Police Department, County of Cayuga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
