Cases 1 - 10 of 24
G&G Closed-Circuit Events, LLC v. Brothers Bar & Grill, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv12999
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed-Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Brothers Bar & Grill, LLC, Derrick Griffin, Andre Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Malik et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Yaya Bilal, Talib LNU, Nafis Akeem Alim Abdullah Malik and others
Defendant:
FNU Parker, FNU LNU, FNU Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Eric Henderson
as 21-4235
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC HENDERSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hebrard v. Malone et al
as 4:2020cv01307
Defendant:
Eric Henderson, Malone and J Reene
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hebrard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv51407
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENDERSON et al v. LEMAR
as 1:2019cv09005
Plaintiff:
ERIC HENDERSON and TASHA MCCOY
Defendant:
SARA LEMAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LONG v. WOLF et al
as 2:2018cv05615
Defendant:
GOVERNOR TOM WOLF, DAVID J. EISWERT and ABBEY JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
ERIC LONG and ERIC HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Michael Lujan v. Bill Ford, et al
as 16-35638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. LUJAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL FORD, Individual Capacity &Official Capacity, CITY OF MEDFORD, Official Capacity, JACKSON COUNTY, Official Capacity and others
Gantt v. City of Newburgh Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv07661
Defendant:
Michael Ferrara, Eric Henderson, Mike Pitt and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Gantt, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
