Cases 11 - 20 of 491
Pivetta v. O'Neil 5 Star, LLC
as 4:2023cv04457
Plaintiff:
Victor Pivetta
Defendant:
O'Neil 5 Star, LLC, Hobas Pipe USA, Inc. and Eric William Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Williams v. Northland Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv05197
Plaintiff:
Eric Williams
Defendant:
Northland Insurance Company, Speedy Auto Transport LLC and Majkut Konrad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
In Re: Mahoney
as 23-2095
Petitioner:
BRIAN E. MAHONEY
Respondent:
ERIC WILLIAMS, Warden, MCFP Springfield
Mahoney v. Williams
as 23-2059
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN E. MAHONEY
Respondent / Appellee:
ERIC WILLIAMS, Warden, MCFP Springfield
Jordan v. Eric William Law Firm Office
as 1:2023cv01464
Plaintiff:
Shereen Jordan
Defendant:
Eric William Law Firm Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Rodriguez-Romero v. Williams
as 6:2023cv03310
Petitioner:
Raul Rodriguez-Romero
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. McGuinness
as 23-7725
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS MCGUINNESS, Superintendent, Shawangunk Corr. Fac.
Wood et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 2:2023cv04924
Plaintiff:
Mark Wood, Anthony Donisi, Gary Byington and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
McIntosh v. Williams
as 0:2023cv02695
Petitioner:
Patrick Randell McIntosh
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dunn v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2023cv03199
Petitioner:
Drake A. Dunn
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
