Cases 11 - 20 of 102
Hixon v. King et al
as 8:2022cv01240
Plaintiff:
Bret Kyle Hixon
Defendant:
Daniel King, Karen Roper, Shannon Ellenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Heslen v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Nicolette Dawn Heslen
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Brian Belleque, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 3:2022cv00138
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
Todd Ishee, Denise Jackson, Prescott Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ralph White v. Kyle Smith
as 22-6143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALPH D. WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
KYLE SMITH, NURSE D. DAMERON, NURSE A. PHYL and others
Taylor #940436 v. Torok et al
as 1:2021cv00779
Plaintiff:
Davariol Marquavis Taylor #940436
Defendant:
Buffy Torok, Unknown Rees, Unknown Hawn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Endicott-Orren v. Peters et al
as 3:2021cv00564
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Anthony Ross, John/Jane Doe, Assistant Superintendent of Security and others
Plaintiff:
Brittany Endicott-Orren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Peters et al
as 3:2021cv00487
Defendant:
Dawnell Meyer, Jane/John Doe, Anthony Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sitts v. Munson et al
as 9:2021cv00155
Plaintiff:
James C. Sitts
Defendant:
Jason Munson and Ericka Puffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peyton v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Ericka Perkins, Craig Coil, Management and Training Corporation and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Peyton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson et al v. Guerin et al
as 3:2020cv00818
Defendant:
Joseph Guerin, Joseph Cole, Miesha Pope and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L Wilson, Sr and Sheila B Self
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
