Cases 41 - 50 of 130
Brown v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv01337
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Brown
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, The Superior Court of Gwinnett County, The Mitchell County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Securus Technologies, Inc.
as 5:2017cv05008
Plaintiff:
Eugene Brown and Sharon Velazquez
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Liberty Healthcare Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv04234
Plaintiff:
Eugene Brown
Defendant:
Liberty Healthcare Corporation, Shan Jumper, Sharlene Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. McVey et al
as 2:2016cv00698
Plaintiff:
Gregory Eugene Brown
Defendant:
John McVey, M. Arroyo and C.O. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. USA
as 3:2016cv00383
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Timothy Eugene Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Kevin Brown
as 16-4296
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN EUGENE BROWN
Brown et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv02714
Plaintiff:
Herman Eugene Brown and Cheryl Brown
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho, LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv00401
Plaintiff:
Eugene Brown
Defendant:
City of New York and Police Officers John Doe 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Liberty Healthcare Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv04193
Plaintiff:
Eugene Brown
Defendant:
Liberty Healthcare Corporation, Shan Jumper, Sharlene Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smego et al v Dimas et al
as 4:2015cv04097
Plaintiff:
Richard M Smego, Dothan Rogers, Jeffrey Alan Hargett and others
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg A. Scott, Michael Bednarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
