Cases 11 - 20 of 79
(PC) Walker v. Nelson et al
as 2:2022cv01327
Plaintiff:
Elmer Eugene Walker
Defendant:
Jenna Nelson, California Legislative Body, Director of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Walker v. Burton
as 2:2022cv00558
Petitioner:
Elmer Walker and Elmer Eugene Walker
Respondent:
R. Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2021pq01410
Plaintiff:
Ione Walker, Individually and on behalf of the Estate of Charles Eugene Walker and Ione Walker
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker et al v. Philips R S North America, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01588
Plaintiff:
Philip Eugene Walker and LINDA WALKER
Defendant:
Philips R S North America, LLC, RESPIRONICS INC. and Georgia Extended Medical Division of Rotech Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walker et al v. Philips R S North America, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv04316
Plaintiff:
Philip Eugene Walker and Linda Walker
Defendant:
Philips R S North America, LLC, Respironics, Inc. and Georgia Extended Medical Division of Rotech Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walker v. Kijakazi
as 6:2021cv03235
Plaintiff:
Freddie Eugene Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Walker v. Brooks, et al.
as 3:2021cv00561
Plaintiff:
Vincent Eugene Walker
Defendant:
Unknown, M. Brooks, RN Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. State of Kansas
as 21-3137
Petitioner / Appellant:
EARNEST EUGENE WALKER, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS
Walker v. Unknown
as 3:2021cv00438
Plaintiff:
Vincent Eugene Walker
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2021cv03150
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Petitioner:
Earnest Eugene Walker, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
