Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Marcus Thorpe v. Derrick Copeland
as 23-6333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS A. THORPE
Defendant / Appellee:
DERRICK COPELAND, f/k/a John Does 1-5, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, f/k/a John Does 1-5 and others
Defendant:
ANITA GOWANS, f/k/a A. Gowans, Nurse, Alexander CI, JOHN DOES, Correctional Officers 1-5, JOHN DOE, Medical Doctor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
SNYDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57943
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN F SNYDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Siste et al
as 8:2021cv00324
Defendant:
Jordan Siste, Jake Yancey, Neil Rambaran and others
Petitioner:
Bernard Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Montanari et al
as 8:2021cv00323
Defendant:
John F. Snyder, Timothy Montanari, David Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snyder v. Saul
as 2:2020cv04097
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Claudia F. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SNYDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv30208
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD F SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Snyder v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (PLR1)
as 1:2017cv00353
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles F. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Snyder v. Stevens
as 2:2017cv00352
Plaintiff:
James F. Snyder
Defendant:
Clayton Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
