Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Flannigan v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2026cv01667
Plaintiff:
Donald Flannigan
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Falcone et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 4:2026cv03557
Plaintiff:
Jules Falcone, Anthony Mott, Brandon Wilkins and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Flannigan v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2026cv00751
Plaintiff:
Donald Flannigan
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-30060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Boone v. General Mills et al
as 4:2025cv00498
Plaintiff:
Demond Travelle Boone
Defendant:
General Mills and Laqueshia Flannigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Flannigan v. Hoover
as 5:2025cv00209
Petitioner:
Ahmad Flannigan
Respondent:
Warden Hoover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Flannigan v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv10770
Defendant:
3M Company, DuPont De Nemours Inc., Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Flannigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Aguilera v. Judge Flannigan
as 2:2025cv00149
Plaintiff:
Liovardo Aguilera
Defendant:
Judge Flannigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Gerack et al
as 2:2025cv00482
Plaintiff:
James Patrick White
Defendant:
Lieutenant Gerack, Lieutenant Flannigan, Sgt. Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
