Cases 21 - 30 of 13,307
Campos-Flores v. Garland
as 24-60203
Petitioner:
Josue Antonio Campos-Flores and Ariela Julissa Iglesias-Ecolero
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
(PC) Nieto v. Allison et al
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Michael Nieto
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Hernandez, Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Aguilera Diaz et al v. Svihel et al
as 0:2024cv01483
Plaintiff:
Allan Juseth Aguilera Diaz, Nahun Alexander Barahona Amador, Jerson Ariel Betanco Flores and others
Defendant:
John J. Svihel and Svihel Vegetable Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595 Civil Remedies: Human Trafficking
Flores Segura, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2513
Petitioner:
ERIC FRANK FLORES SEGURA, JOHANA ALEXANDRA VIGNOLO ESPINOZA, ARELY MARIANA FLORES VIGNOLO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Wang v. Thygesen et al
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kailin Wang
Defendant:
Christoffer Stanford Thygesen, Allan Christoffer Thygesen, Teresa Thygesen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Erick Flores-Turcios v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1338
Petitioner:
ERICK JESUS FLORES-TURCIOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Elore v. Unknown Defendant 4:24-CV-339-P
as 4:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Orenda Ethelarue Flore
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant 4:24-CV-339-P
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Ronnys Batista Flores
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Malcolm Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Aaron Flores Palacios v. Precision Anodizing and Plating, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Aaron Flores Palacios
Defendant:
Precision Anodizing & Plating, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
